tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515247115132134144.post5120396940755099178..comments2024-02-17T12:34:01.400-08:00Comments on Illusion of Prosperity: Nominal Aggregate Wage Growth by DecadeStagflationary Markhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04568993350246477976noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515247115132134144.post-56638553599248286442014-09-27T17:45:52.777-07:002014-09-27T17:45:52.777-07:00Troy,
Not quite the same thing
Understatement of...Troy,<br /><br /><i>Not quite the same thing</i><br /><br />Understatement of the year! Sigh.Stagflationary Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04568993350246477976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515247115132134144.post-80203318731949980572014-09-27T14:49:08.925-07:002014-09-27T14:49:08.925-07:00Each decade 1970, 80s, 90s saw 20M jobs added
200...Each decade 1970, 80s, 90s saw 20M jobs added<br /><br />2002-2014 has seen +10M jobs, twice.<br /><br />Not quite the same thingTroynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515247115132134144.post-24732237963923596082014-09-27T14:45:50.125-07:002014-09-27T14:45:50.125-07:00http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=LCI
...<a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=LCI" rel="nofollow">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=LCI</a><br /><br />employees vs. 74% of 15-64 peeps<br /><br />10 million more people out of work compared to the good times of 1999<br /><br />"2,000 zero zero" Troynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8515247115132134144.post-24510378325286971932014-09-24T08:26:52.150-07:002014-09-24T08:26:52.150-07:00Just to be clear, I'm displaying annual growth...Just to be clear, I'm displaying annual growth rates as determined by exponential growth curve fitting for each decade.Stagflationary Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04568993350246477976noreply@blogger.com