I live in the USA and I am concerned about the future. I created this blog to share my thoughts on the economy and anything else that might catch my attention.
my parents had nothing in 1979, they started paying down the mortgage soon after. Paid it off 5 years ago now. Mortgage was cheaper than renting (they got most of the +70% housing inflation of the 1980s so I guess it was never wasted money.
Equity is actually a very squirelly concept -- millions of Casey Serins borrowing $3T+ in 2005-2006, boosted home values and giving every homeowner $100,000 in phantom equity . . .
The reality of our fiscal dilemma centers on two unfortunate facts -- we've deferring taxes like crazy, and we've borrowed $10T+ against past & present home valuations.
blue line is mortgage debt red line is gov't + household debt (less mortg debt)
So we've capped our mortgage debt at $10T while boosting our systemic debt from ~$10T in 2002 to $20T+ now.
If and when we start bending that red curve down again, home values just have to take it in the pants.
well, that's my thesis and I'm sticking to it : )
That red line doesn't even count the $4T+ intra-government debt that doesn't officially exist apparently. $2.7T of that is the SSTF, and that should be paid down to $1T by 2030, that's $100B/yr right there of deferred tax liability.
If I were sane I'd stop by Big 5 Sports, buy a kayak and stores, drive straight to the coast, and start paddling west!
offshoring trend since 1950, ever-expanding mortgage debt, central role of DOD spending in recirculating money into the economy -- Fuller is doing a decent tour d'horizon in "Legally Piggily".
He even introduces the 1% meme:
"In one way the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. citizens are in much the same socioeconomic position. The Communist party which runs the U.S.S.R. consists of about 1 percent of their total population, while the U.S.A. is controlled by about the same 1 percent, who are the LAWCAP strategists of the great U.S.A. corporations.
"The U.S.A. is not run by its would-be "democratic" government. All the latter can do is try to adjust to the initiatives already taken by LAWCAP's great corporations. Nothing could be more pathetic than the role that has to be played by the President of the United States, whose power is approximately zero. Nevertheless, the news media and most over-thirty-years-of-age U.S.A. citizens carry on as if the president had supreme power. All that he and the Congress can do is adjust to what the "free-enterprise system" has already done. They are riding on the snapping end of the power-structure dragon's tail."
Yeah, funny how Iceland has fallen down the memory hole. Hard sayin' why that might be. I mean, hard without resorting to discredited conspiracy theories about TPTB and MSM ownership.
Speaking of, why are conspiracy theories categorically discredited? I, myself, don't seen a whole lot of actual discrediting. Usually the discrediting consists of arrogant snark and bandwagon appeals. Well, that is when those doing the discrediting aren't outright lying.
"In the euphoria, the dangers of a strategy of "economic growth based on vast foreign borrowing" were overlooked. Icelanders lived out the dictum of Plautus, the third century BC Roman playwright, who had one of his characters declare: 'I am a rich man, as long as I do not repay my creditors.'"
and:
"The supply-side economist Arthur Laffer assured the Icelandic business community in 2007 that fast economic growth with a large trade deficit and ballooning foreign debt were signs of success: 'Iceland should be a model to the world.'"
As for conspiracy theory, Fuller was going full-on with that in his 1981 book, drawing a connection between the East India Company capitalizing the new US in the early 19th century and the rise of JPM's finance-capitalism in the latter part. He then says "Wall Street Lawyer Capitalism" established itself in the aftermath of the 1920s.
That's 33 years of nothing. Sigh.
ReplyDeletemy parents had nothing in 1979, they started paying down the mortgage soon after. Paid it off 5 years ago now. Mortgage was cheaper than renting (they got most of the +70% housing inflation of the 1980s so I guess it was never wasted money.
ReplyDeleteEquity is actually a very squirelly concept -- millions of Casey Serins borrowing $3T+ in 2005-2006, boosted home values and giving every homeowner $100,000 in phantom equity . . .
The reality of our fiscal dilemma centers on two unfortunate facts -- we've deferring taxes like crazy, and we've borrowed $10T+ against past & present home valuations.
Here's the graph:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/?g=bz7
blue line is mortgage debt
red line is gov't + household debt (less mortg debt)
So we've capped our mortgage debt at $10T while boosting our systemic debt from ~$10T in 2002 to $20T+ now.
If and when we start bending that red curve down again, home values just have to take it in the pants.
well, that's my thesis and I'm sticking to it : )
That red line doesn't even count the $4T+ intra-government debt that doesn't officially exist apparently. $2.7T of that is the SSTF, and that should be paid down to $1T by 2030, that's $100B/yr right there of deferred tax liability.
If I were sane I'd stop by Big 5 Sports, buy a kayak and stores, drive straight to the coast, and start paddling west!
heh, ol' Bucky was a wacky dude but he saw the problem back in 1981:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.american-buddha.com/Critical%20Path%20pic%204.jpg
offshoring trend since 1950, ever-expanding mortgage debt, central role of DOD spending in recirculating money into the economy -- Fuller is doing a decent tour d'horizon in "Legally Piggily".
He even introduces the 1% meme:
"In one way the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. citizens are in much the same socioeconomic position. The Communist party which runs the U.S.S.R. consists of about 1 percent of their total population, while the U.S.A. is controlled by about the same 1 percent, who are the LAWCAP strategists of the great U.S.A. corporations.
"The U.S.A. is not run by its would-be "democratic" government. All the latter can do is try to adjust to the initiatives already taken by LAWCAP's great corporations. Nothing could be more pathetic than the role that has to be played by the President of the United States, whose power is approximately zero. Nevertheless, the news media and most over-thirty-years-of-age U.S.A. citizens carry on as if the president had supreme power. All that he and the Congress can do is adjust to what the "free-enterprise system" has already done. They are riding on the snapping end of the power-structure dragon's tail."
Preach it, Brother Bucky!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYeah, funny how Iceland has fallen down the memory hole. Hard sayin' why that might be. I mean, hard without resorting to discredited conspiracy theories about TPTB and MSM ownership.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of, why are conspiracy theories categorically discredited? I, myself, don't seen a whole lot of actual discrediting. Usually the discrediting consists of arrogant snark and bandwagon appeals. Well, that is when those doing the discrediting aren't outright lying.
memory hole
ReplyDeleteCompare and contrast to TARP circa 2008 & election results barely one month later. Best argument I've witnessed for we get the govt we deserve.
Not sure what Ireland & Greece's excuse is.
population of iceland is 300,000.
ReplyDelete"In the euphoria, the dangers of a strategy of "economic growth based on vast foreign borrowing" were overlooked. Icelanders lived out the dictum of Plautus, the third century BC Roman playwright, who had one of his characters declare: 'I am a rich man, as long as I do not repay my creditors.'"
and:
"The supply-side economist Arthur Laffer assured the Icelandic business community in 2007 that fast economic growth with a large trade deficit and ballooning foreign debt were signs of success: 'Iceland should be a model to the world.'"
from:
http://www.hermes-press.com/iceland_index.htm
"The benefits of low taxes are on full display in Iceland, which provides an almost perfect demonstration of the Laffer Curve. "
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB117330772978430098.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks
(warning: Kudlow)
As for conspiracy theory, Fuller was going full-on with that in his 1981 book, drawing a connection between the East India Company capitalizing the new US in the early 19th century and the rise of JPM's finance-capitalism in the latter part. He then says "Wall Street Lawyer Capitalism" established itself in the aftermath of the 1920s.
Hard to dispute that I guess.
"Money, money, money -- it's a Rich Man's World" -- Abba, 1976
Troy & AllanF,
ReplyDeleteOne of my favorite musical tributes involves Iceland's racking.
P.S. Also had the ABBA song as a musical tribute once. It was disabled in YouTube though.
Another candidate for musical tribute would be Smashing Pumpkins "1979".
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aeETEoNfOg
Scott,
ReplyDeleteWe feel the pull in the land of a thousand guilts
And poured cement, lamented and assured
Yeah, I think that works. Sigh.