Food prices poised to drop sharply: Yardeni
TORONTO — Market strategist Ed Yardeni, who made a name for himself with accurate calls on the U.S. stock market's bull runs of recent decades, says that soaring food prices won't last because farmers are rushing to plant more crops and agricultural productivity is increasing with new investment.
Just bull runs? Why is that sounding an alarm bell?
“There's so much capital now that's going to pour into agriculture that I think food prices are going to come down sharply,” Mr. Yardeni said at a presentation Wednesday morning sponsored by Thomson Reuters Academy.
So much more money pours into something and it automatically leads to sharply lower prices? Good to know. Quick, someone get the government to give me a trillion dollars. I want to do my part to help. I promise to pour it into lots of things. I think I'll start with rice just for kicks and giggles. I wonder if Costco accepts rather large third-party government checks?
And U.S. consumers are likely to surprise economists with their spending even in the midst of a huge downturn in housing prices..
I think it is safe to say we're being surprised. In fact, that might have something to do with why the government is sending out tax rebate checks to reduce the suspense. Just a hunch.
“You know how we Americans are,” Mr. Yardeni said. “When we're happy we spend money, and when we're depressed, we spend more.”
And what do we do if we are Greatly Depressed? Spend even more?
I never heard of him. I was curious just how much of a name he made for himself. Maybe you will be too. The first one is a must read. It plays out like a comedy sketch, lol.
January 24, 2000
Hypester Yardeni is Y2KO'd
I'm not going to blame anyone. The data were what were available at the time. I'm not making any excuses. The three summarizing words are "I was wrong."
November 3, 2000
False Assumptions about the Market's Future
To be sure, Buffett is a long-time skeptic about the stock market's high valuations. But Edward Yardeni, an economist and New Economy booster at Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, essentially agrees with the legendary investor. Yardeni believes nominal GDP will average a 6% growth rate over the next 10 years (4% or 5% GDP growth and 2% or 1% inflation) and that corporate earnings won't do much better than that. However, he does think the earnings and stock prices of the S&P 500 could increase at a 10% pace, thanks to the growing dominance of high-tech companies in that index. Still, that pales next to the S&P 500's 26% average annual gain from 1995 through 1999.
The S&P 500 index closed at 1427 on November 3, 2000.
The S&P 500 index closed today at 1409.
Warren Buffett: 1
Edward Yardeni: 0
How very stagflationary. It seems the #1 "false assumption" was the 10% pace. Maybe that's just me though.
Real Estate Newsletter Articles this Week: Existing-Home Sales Increased to
4.15 million SAAR in November
-
At the Calculated Risk Real Estate Newsletter this week:
[image: Existing Home Sales]*Click on graph for larger image.*
• NAR: Existing-Home Sales Increase...
11 hours ago
7 comments:
Edward Yardeni had better see if more capital can change the weather. Farmers where I live haven't been able to plant due to rain and with the spike in fuel a lot of them are only going to plant what they have already sold forward. He might want to try and get stock predations down first before he switches to commodities.
Kevin
Kevin,
When I saw your comment, I was hoping that someone was taking me up on my most generous trillion dollar food price reduction plan.
Instead, you opted to go down the cold hard weather reality path. I can feel the deflation kicking in though. Check it out.
For a mere $900 billion (a 10% reduction in price!) I would RAIN $800 billion in cold hard cash down from the skies. From a helicopter no less!
That would still leave me $100 billion to pour directly into basmati rice deflation at my local Costco, thereby ensuring that the world had enough rice to eat.
Think about it. Once the world finds out one lone anonymous shopper at a local Costco was willing to spend $100 billion on rice there would certainly be more rice grown (at the expense of everything else perhaps).
Little would they realize that I'd also be investing in rice burning technology (compare to corn burning ethanol technology).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rice_burner
More contemporary use of the term rice burner, along with the prefix rice, has taken on an alternate pejorative meaning for an automobile that has been modified to give impression of high performance, but does not necessarily have any high-performance capabilities.
Perhaps the tax rebate checks are a form of rice burning. Maybe somebody else beat me to it.
I sure hope I'm joking but this really is starting to make cents to me. Um, I mean cents for me. Sense to me! Whew!
Note to self: Never speak of government conspiracies again lest you eat the beans. Um, I mean spill the beans. That's not what I mean to say! There are no beans to spill. Did someone say no beans? Bean shortages!!! Holy @#$%!!! Panic!! ;)
Dude, you been drinking?
Between this comment and the headline schtick, ummm... seems like.
:-)
AllanF,
You are very close to the truth. I didn't sleep well and was therefore quite sleep deprived. No joke!
I was certainly in no condition to drive. Let's just put it that way, lol.
I should add that no alcohol nor Kool-Aid was involved though. :)
It all depends upon how much the government meddles. The more they manipulate, the worse it will be for the farmers and consumers. The special interests and global agricompanies will make out well.
BioFuels,
It all depends upon how much the government meddles.
Agreed.
I suspect the worse it gets the more the government will meddle. The more government meddles the worse it will get.
Let's hope the feedback loop stops at some point.
Post a Comment