data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cf1e/9cf1e4e8e3b655f8b75b33d89de0f89e83a567d2" alt=""
Click to enlarge.
The black line shows the employment level of 16-24 year old workers divided by the employment level of 55+ year old workers (left scale).
The blue line shows the 3-month treasury yield (right scale).
Coincidence? Let's make a scatter chart of that data.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5004/b5004ca119dfc73852d85c9bf8bf72474a047273" alt=""
Click to enlarge.
That's a fairly high correlation. I bet we can do better though. The data is noisy. Let's smooth it out by using 10-year moving averages and try again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa5b/7fa5bd6fee595498b2011537dedf9b41b5078d16" alt=""
Click to enlarge.
Coincidence? I think not. Let's do another scatter chart.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b99a/8b99a227a5d3787b97ad1b3dbe20cd827fd27973" alt=""
Click to enlarge.
That's a very high correlation. If this chart is any indicator, then those anxiously awaiting a return to the interest rates of the 1970s may be in for an extremely long wait.
This is not investment advice.
Update:
I noticed a labeling error in my charts. It has been corrected.
Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart
2 comments:
I made a mistake in these charts and am currently correcting it.
It isn't 55+ year olds / 16-24 year olds. It's the other way around.
I should have it fixed shortly.
Fixed.
Post a Comment