Monday, May 24, 2010

Stimulus Physics Update #3



This is and was always intended to be a joke. It would seem that the joke is on us though. Go figure.

So what will the future have in store? My crystal ball is foggy. It's just too close to call.



Uh, Tower, US Air 2998, ‘til we figure out what’s going on down there, we’re just going to stay clear of all runways.

I'm with US Air 2998 on this one.

See Also:
Stimulus Physics
Stimulus Physics Update #1
Stimulus Physics Update #2
Trend Line Disclaimer

Source Data:
Yahoo: Historical Prices for Dow Jones Industrial Average

7 comments:

EconomicDisconnect said...

This was a terrible incident on a runway:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenerife_disaster

Scary stuff.

Stagflationary Mark said...

GYSC,

From your link...

"The sudden fog greatly limited visibility."

There was a similarly terrible incident in our stock market this month. ;)

EconomicDisconnect said...

Fat fingered fog? Is that a real thing?

mab said...

GYSC,

Fat fingered fog? Is that a real thing?

It is. We have a fat fingered oil slick in the Gulf right now. And we had fat fingered weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. We had fat fingered bank bonuses.

Worse still the Phillies had a phat fingered loss to the Bosox yesterday - GRRRRRR!

It's all about dumbing it down to sound bites and inane explanations. It's all about lowering the bar.

Hey, let's face it, the fat finger thing works.

Stagflationary Mark said...

GYSC & mab,

We got the Fat Finger Blues.

EconomicDisconnect said...

Mark,
that dude needs a slide if he is gonna play real blues:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0QKbnCDW94

Mab,
How low can you go, on the hand jive:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doujhGmCwbY

I may have moved from a Wikipedia addiction to the more dangerous Youtube addiction. Wiki is a gateway drug!!!!!!!!!

Stagflationary Mark said...

GYSC,

I may have moved from a Wikipedia addiction to the more dangerous Youtube addiction. Wiki is a gateway drug!!!!!!!!!

The best part about Wiki is that some of the information isn't even remotely accurate and it is up to the reader to figure that out, lol.

That said...

December 15, 2005
Study: Wikipedia as accurate as Britannica

In the end, the journal found just eight serious errors, such as general misunderstandings of vital concepts, in the articles. Of those, four came from each site. They did, however, discover a series of factual errors, omissions or misleading statements. All told, Wikipedia had 162 such problems, while Britannica had 123.