Thursday, August 8, 2013

10-Year Treasury Yield Inverse

I was told on Bloomberg today that rising yields are obvious. It was just said as a matter of fact. That reminded me of a quote.

Markets are constantly in a state of uncertainty and flux and money is made by discounting the obvious and betting on the unexpected. - George Soros

The following chart shows the inverse of the 10-year treasury yield. For example, a 5% yield would be a 20 on the chart (1 / 0.05 = 20).


Click to enlarge.

The downward trend in treasury yields has been predicted to fail for many years. As seen in the chart, the only thing that's truly failed so far is its exact opposite (its inverse) though. Further, when most trends fail they tend to fail in the opposite direction as the original trend. That was not the case here. For example, did the long-term upward exponential trend in job creation fail to the upside? I think not.

We're now simply back in the long-term channel. It's hard to read much into that. I wouldn't be willing to use the word "obvious" until we pass through 30 to the downside on this chart (and stay there for a full semi-annual period). Then we'll talk about the trend in falling yields being over. Until that point, I just don't see the "obviousness" of it that many seem to see.

1 / 30 = 3.33%

Now that's a target yield worthy of consideration. Based on the stock market's strength recently, I'm kind of surprised we aren't even closer to it than we are. On a relative basis (considering the long-term trend in the chart above), yields were very high heading into the last recession. Perhaps we're just not there yet, or perhaps many investors like myself are starting to really believe in the death of real yields story. You know, burn me once (dotcom bubble) shame on you. Burn me twice (housing bubble), shame on me. The saying just sort of stops there though. For what it is worth, I personally don't want to risk what happens after the third burning, lol. Sigh.

So why am I charting the inverse here? I have a fairly good reason actually.

I think many are failing to realize that the difference between a 0.2% yield and a 0.1% yield can be the same as the difference between a 20% yield and a 10% yield, especially in regards to an over-leveraged society.

Here's an example.

If I borrow $10,000 @ 10%, then I have to make $1,000 annual interest payments.
If I borrow half as much @ 20%, then I still have to make $1,000 annual interest payments.

If I borrow $1,000,000 @ 0.1%, then I have to make $1,000 annual interest payments.
If I borrow half as much @ 0.2%, then I still have to make $1,000 annual interest payments.

When seen in this context, the difference between 1% interest rates and 0% interest rates is infinite (0.01 / 0.00 = infinity), which is clearly not at all the trivial amount most would suggest. We could therefore continue to approach 0% without ever really reaching it.

Put another way, 0% is like a singularity. We may have already entered its event horizon. At 0%, the forces of leverage can become infinite. Just as in Japan, there may be no easy exit from such ultimate goal madness.

NASA: Event Horizon and Time

If you (in a space ship, for example) were to approach the event horizon and cross it, to a person watching you from a great distance it would look like you moved slower and slower as you got closer and closer to the horizon. To them it would look like you never quite reached the horizon. But this is an illusion caused by the fact that the light you emit from your space ship is taking longer and longer to reach the outside observer. This is due to the black hole's immense gravity. From your own point of view, you reach the horizon and cross it, with nothing special happening at the boundary. But of course, the gravitational forces of the black hole will crush you do death sooner or later!

Isn't that exactly what people have been saying about Japan since their housing bubble popped in the early 1990s? They've certainly been moving slower and slower to outside observers. Like most, I would also argue that their debt may crush them at some point. I'm only questioning the timing of when it may happen to us. If Japan is any indicator, sooner or later could be a very, very long time.

And now for the moral of the story.

In any event horizon, there's always a bull market in black holes. If indeed we've got another one, then try not to get sucked in like the Japanese did (Nikkei 225 Index Adjusted for Japanese CPI)! There are worse things in life than being slowly crushed to death by supposedly rising treasury yields, especially if held to maturity.

This is not investment advice. As usual, just opinions.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart
U.S. Treasury: Daily Yield Curve

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

China's "Growth" Story in One Chart


Click to enlarge.

See Also:
Sarcasm Disclaimer

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart

Real Dividends per Capita


Click to enlarge.

The tree that stands above the others gets blown down - Chinese proverb

Okay, yes. Technically speaking, the tree was blown down in 2009. It's not going to happen again though. This new tree has a concrete base reinforced with rebar!

Root system? This new tree don't need no stinkin' root system. It's growing to the sky without one!

Wiktionary: no tree grows to the sky

There are limits on growth. Growth does not continue indefinitely, eventually it will halt or collapse.

Oh, please. Infinite ZIRP fertilizer equals infinite growth! Everybody knows it, except for those clueless Japanese.


Click to enlarge.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart
St. Louis Fed: Interest Rates, Discount Rate for Japan

Prosperity Euphoric Reflux Disease

GERD -> BURP

PERD -> ZIRP

Got antacids? ;)

Small Time Deposits vs. Large Time Deposits


Click to enlarge.

Small time deposits have become an endangered species.

There was a temporary exponential trend failure (seen in the break from the blue line) heading into the Great Recession, but we're apparently getting back on trend soon (using the new red line).

Giant Sucking Sound

The phrase, coined during the 1992 U.S. presidential campaign, referred to the sound of U.S. jobs heading south for Mexico should the proposed free-trade agreement go into effect.

North American Free Trade Agreement

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an agreement signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States, creating a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994.


Click to enlarge.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart
St. Louis Fed: Trade Balance: Goods and Services, Balance of Payments Basis

Monday, August 5, 2013

Hussman's a Must Read This Week

August 5, 2013
Hussman Funds - Weekly Market Commentary: The Minsky Bubble

...investors presently seem to believe that these profit margins are a permanent fixture...

What’s fascinating about QE is that it has no transmission mechanism to the real economy except as a weak can-kicking exercise - and even then only by creating enormous distortions in pursuit of minute "wealth effects."

The fact is that long-term interest rates are virtually unchanged since August 2010, when Bernanke first hinted at shifting to quantitative easing as the Fed’s main policy tool.

It’s worth observing that the 10-year Treasury yield is also well above the weighted average interest rate since 2010.

Meanwhile, margin debt on the NYSE now stands well above 2% of GDP – a level also (and only) reached at the 2000 and 2007 peaks.

A few quick economic observations. Since May, the number of individuals classified as “Employed, usually work part time” has increased by 534,000. The number of individuals classified as “Employed, usually work full time” has declined by 148,000. So its employment (a lagging indicator) has increased in recent months, but composition is deteriorating notably.

Emphasis added. The article is just filled with juicy tidbits.

It would seem that we both were thinking about the impact of part time employees and margin debt this past weekend. Go figure.

And on that note, I'd much rather hold the "The Unloved 10-Year Treasury" to maturity than short it to maturity. I'm experiencing a disturbing sensation of long-term déjà vu.

This is not investment advice.

19-Year TIPS Trading Update


Click to enlarge.

The solid blue line shows the median over the period that it covers (mid 2004 through 2008). Both the solid red line and the solid orange line show the linear trends over the periods that they cover. All ghost lines are extrapolations forward of their solid versions.

Linear trend failures abound, mostly to the downside (with one notable exception recently).


Click to enlarge.

I am not experiencing buyer's remorse over the 19-year TIPS purchase on June 20th. It seemed like a relatively good long-term opportunity at the time and it still does.

Since I fully intend to hold to maturity, I doubt I will ever experience remorse (barring a complete financial collapse or hyperinflation, neither of which I am predicting over the life of the bond). That would be true even if real rates were to rise from here over the long-term. In fact, I root for higher rates so that I can repeat the process with the interest this particular bond generates. And what is the process of which I speak?

This 19-year TIPS was purchased using the accumulated interest of the 29-year TIPS purchase that I made in 2011. Not surprisingly, I have experienced no buyer's remorse over that purchase either, much to the dismay of Jeremy Siegel.

Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: 20-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Security, Constant Maturity
St. Louis Fed: Daily Real Yield Curve Rates