The following chart shows the 10-year moving average of financial corporate equities divided by annual wage and salary accruals.
Click to enlarge.
After the spectacular long-term parabolic trend failure of the Big Dipper, the Fed (with the help of NASA) is stress testing the hell out of the short-term parabolic Little Dipper!
Have no fear! Nothing can ever go wrong again!
Source Data:
St. Louis Fed: Custom Chart
Q4 GDP Tracking: Mid 2% Range
-
From Goldman:
We left our *Q4 GDP tracking estimate unchanged at +2.4%
(quarter-over-quarter annualized)* but boosted our Q4 domestic final sales
forecas...
4 hours ago
7 comments:
It seems what you are missing is a "Parabolic Trend Probability of Failure Predictor" (a PTPFP).
Seems like if you took all your "Parabolic Trends" and all the failures of those trends, you could come up with a distribution of where all the trends failed. Then, using the power of bullshit, you could draw conclusions about future trend failures and publish a book with the title of "An Investors Guide to Predicting Future Changes in Parabolic Trends : ".
I'm worried, however, that this word "failure" will scare-off potential "investors". Is there a more optimistic word that you can think of for Trend "Failure"; it's so... negative.
But, anyway, you could be famous, and be able to accumulate Ferrari's for your retirement savings plan.
Anonymous,
Is there a more optimistic word that you can think of for Trend "Failure"; it's so... negative.
Collapse? Breakdown? Bust? Implosion? Fiasco?
I don't know. I suppose I could call it a new word that doesn't exist.
How about Igbliss? The unsustainable parabola igblissed! Yes!
Bust? Did someone say bust? :)
Rob Dawg,
Bust déjà vu!
I have this sagging thought that we've been through these puns before. Hahaha!! :)
Right on the button! [groan!]
These puns are getting lopsided. We need to keep our eyes focused elsewhere.
Okay, that's it. I'm done now. :)
(°)(°)
or
(•)(•)
or
(.)(.)
It's ALL good!
Post a Comment